Mockingjay: Part 1

Turns a political struggle into something thrillingly personal.

The Beat Beneath My Feet

A toe-tapping indie that is, quite simply lovely.


An extraordinary true tale made disappointingly ordinary.

The Battle of the Five Armies

"Why does it hurt so much?" Because the rest of it felt so real.

Star Ratings

Well good

iFlicks on Twitter

Home Reviews Cinema reviews Film review: Life Just Is (2012)
Film review: Life Just Is (2012) Print E-mail
Written by Ivan Radford   
Thursday, 06 December 2012 15:55
Life Just Is - film review
Director: Alex Barrett
Cast: Paul Nicholls, Jack Gordon, Fiona Ryan, Jayne Wisener, Rachel Bright, Will de Meo, Nathaniel Martello-White

“Knowing that you’re going to die would surely give your life some sort of freedom...”
“We’re all going to die.”
“Yeah, I know. But that’s a bit abstract...”

That’s the kind of dialogue you can expect from Life Just Is. Alex Barrett’s low-budget feature doesn’t so much portray the awkward twenty-something limbo between university and the real world as tackle it head on. It’s an approach that impresses in its attempts at honesty and philosophical discussions, but drags when it comes to actually watching it.

It’s a shame, because there are things to admire here – namely, the talented young cast. Fiona Ryan is superbly realistic as the artistic Claire, who finds herself slowly attracted to Tom (Nathaniel Martello-White). Her friend Jay struggles with a fear of commitment that Jayne Wisener wisely underplays, while Paul Nicholls’ appearance as her new boyfriend is a neat reminder of the former Eastenders star’s easygoing screen presence.

But Barrett’s script unfortunately doesn’t do them any favours. It centres most of all on Pete (Gordon), who finds himself going through a crisis of non-faith. One scene in which he wakes up in fits and starts to a vision of St. Francis is eerily effective – but then Pete goes on to talk about it for the rest of the film.


It’s nice to see a young British filmmaker bring a European approach to kitchen sink realism, but the laboured pretension of the discussions, mentioning Kierkegaard every few minutes, soon starts to grate. To be fair to Barrett, it probably would in real life as well.